Supreme Court upholds equitable value maximisation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Download pdf

Published On: 27/11/2018

Practice Area: Corporate & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dispute Resolution

Authors:

Nishant Singh
Nikhil Bhat
Pooja Dadoo
The Supreme Court of India recently dismissed an appeal by a competing resolution applicant, asserting that the acceptance of UltraTech's recent resolution plan to acquire the distressed Indian cement manufacturer, Binani Cement, violated the insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. INDUSLAW's Nishant Singh, Pooja Dadoo and Nikhil Bhat discuss the court’s judgment in detail.

Related Posts:

Recently, the Supreme Court of India in Kalyani Transco v. M/s Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. & Ors directed Bhushan Power and Steel Limited to be liquidated under the provisions of the Insolvency and B...

UNRAVELING THE FACADE OF RESOLUTION: SAGA OF BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LIMITED

In a watershed moment for India’s insolvency and competition law regime, the Supreme Court of India (“SC”), in Independent Sugar Corporation Ltd. v. Girish Sriram Juneja, has delivered a majorit...

Mandatory CCI Approval Before CoC Voting: A Watershed Moment for Competition and Insolvency Law in India

The Supreme Court, in a landmark decision (Asha Dubey v. State of Madhya Pradesh), has ruled that being declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 of the CrPC does not preclude the right of a per...

Supreme Court: There is no bar on seeking anticipatory bail even if the applicant is declared as a proclaimed offender under Section 82 of the CrPC

Recently, the Delhi High Court in Ovington Finance Pvt. Ltd. v. Bindiya Nagar held that the court for the purpose of extension of an arbitral tribunal’s mandate is the court that appointed the arbit...

“‘Court’ For Extension of Arbitrator’s Mandate – A Legal Quandary”