EXEMPLARY COSTS FOR HABITUAL TRADEMARK INFRINGERS

Download pdf

Published On: 19/11/2018

Practice Area: Intellectual Property, Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Authors:

Aditi Verma Thakur
In August 2018, in the case of Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited vs. Galpha Laboratories Limited and Another, the High Court of Bombay imposed exemplary damages to the tune of INR 1.5 crore on Galpha Laboratories Limited for habitually infringing the trademark rights of Glenmark Laboratories Limited. INDUSLAW's Aditi Verma Thakur and Pooja Nair discuss this case and its implications.

Related Posts:

In a landmark verdict, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India has decided that unstamped arbitration agreements are not valid in law. INDUS

RECENT JUDGEMENT BY THE CONSTITUTION BENCH OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: UNSTAMPED ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS ARE NOT VALID IN LAW

Recently, the Hon’ble Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal held that Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 does not explicitly limit changing of prayers from see...

MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLOWS PURCHASERS TO CHANGE RELIEFS FROM SEEKING POSSESSION TO REFUND WITH INTEREST IF DUE PROCESS OF LAW WAS FOLLOWED

The early part of this year witnessed a plethora of key decisions from the Apex Court and certain High Courts in the field of arbitration. Addressing various interpretational issues, especially arisin...

ARBITRATION

The year 2021 witnessed significant developments in the arbitration landscape in India, with several noteworthy decisions of the High Courts and the Supreme Court of India. In this inaugural edition o...

Infolex Arbitration Newsletter (First edition)